这是一个创建于 3881 天前的主题，其中的信息可能已经有所发展或是发生改变。
http://centminmod.com/siegebenchmarks/2013/020313/
本来想用nginx 替代 express的static，这是闹哪样~
Quite interesting to see how well node.js clustered static file server scaled almost 2x times better in terms of transactions per second compared to Nginx web server **(4,250 trans/s vs 2,118 trans/s)** - especially at the higher concurrency levels. Also check out average response times **(0.14s vs 0.23s)**, longest transaction time **(1.10s vs 13.95s)** and transaction availability numbers all in node.js's favour.
本来想用nginx 替代 express的static，这是闹哪样~
Quite interesting to see how well node.js clustered static file server scaled almost 2x times better in terms of transactions per second compared to Nginx web server **(4,250 trans/s vs 2,118 trans/s)** - especially at the higher concurrency levels. Also check out average response times **(0.14s vs 0.23s)**, longest transaction time **(1.10s vs 13.95s)** and transaction availability numbers all in node.js's favour.
 |
1
yuankui 2015 年 7 月 1 日
性能往往不是瓶颈...
|
 |
2
ChiangDi 2015 年 7 月 1 日 via Android
有问题吧，它这个 benchmark 不是用 express 的 static 吧
|
 |
4
newghost 2015 年 7 月 1 日
没有测试代码……
感觉像是node.js里面做了缓存 |
Select Language