这是一个创建于 984 天前的主题，其中的信息可能已经有所发展或是发生改变。
这算逆优化么 😂
结果：
arch -arm64e openssl speed -evp aes-256-gcm
LibreSSL 2.8.3
built on: date not available
options:bn(64,64) rc4(ptr,int) des(idx,cisc,16,int) aes(partial) blowfish(idx)
compiler: information not available
The 'numbers' are in 1000s of bytes per second processed.
type 16 bytes 64 bytes 256 bytes 1024 bytes 8192 bytes
aes-256-gcm 143582.05k 146068.54k 143675.00k 143172.47k 143065.32k
arch -x86_64 openssl speed -evp aes-256-gcm
LibreSSL 2.8.3
built on: date not available
options:bn(64,64) rc4(16x,int) des(idx,cisc,16,int) aes(partial) blowfish(idx)
compiler: information not available
The 'numbers' are in 1000s of bytes per second processed.
type 16 bytes 64 bytes 256 bytes 1024 bytes 8192 bytes
aes-256-gcm 513189.06k 1466338.36k 1692859.34k 1656888.24k 1660308.10k
第 1 条附言 · 2022-04-19 16:17:19 +08:00
OpenSSL 1.1.1n 15 Mar 2022
built on: Tue Mar 15 14:37:47 2022 UTC
options:bn(64,64) rc4(int) des(int) aes(partial) idea(int) blowfish(ptr)
compiler: clang -fPIC -arch arm64 -O3 -Wall -DL_ENDIAN -DOPENSSL_PIC -DOPENSSL_CPUID_OBJ -DOPENSSL_BN_ASM_MONT -DSHA1_ASM -DSHA256_ASM -DSHA512_ASM -DKECCAK1600_ASM -DVPAES_ASM -DECP_NISTZ256_ASM -DPOLY1305_ASM -D_REENTRANT -DNDEBUG
The 'numbers' are in 1000s of bytes per second processed.
type 16 bytes 64 bytes 256 bytes 1024 bytes 8192 bytes 16384 bytes
aes-256-gcm 1001410.93k 2674462.35k 4020612.61k 4051648.47k 3813676.37k 3968878.79k
重新用 OpenSSL 跑了下，好像自带的 LibreSSL 有点问题
第 2 条附言 · 2022-04-19 17:22:51 +08:00
原生情况下跑了 AES 128 GCM，这128和256差距也太大了吧
arch -arm64e openssl speed -evp aes-128-gcm -multi 10
LibreSSL 2.8.3
built on: date not available
options:bn(64,64) rc4(ptr,int) des(idx,cisc,16,int) aes(partial) blowfish(idx)
compiler: information not available
evp 17771871.76k 71601419.60k 287914482.61k 1148759522.20k 9167217710.93k
arch -arm64e openssl speed -evp aes-128-gcm
LibreSSL 2.8.3
built on: date not available
options:bn(64,64) rc4(ptr,int) des(idx,cisc,16,int) aes(partial) blowfish(idx)
compiler: information not available
The 'numbers' are in 1000s of bytes per second processed.
type 16 bytes 64 bytes 256 bytes 1024 bytes 8192 bytes
aes-128-gcm 2219882.36k 8934119.25k 35553156.84k 142883225.35k 1141059247.03k
 |
1
xtinput 2022-04-19 15:37:42 +08:00
我的 M1Max 和你这个数据差不多
|
 |
2
keyfunc OP ```
OpenSSL 1.1.1n 15 Mar 2022 built on: Tue Mar 15 14:37:47 2022 UTC options:bn(64,64) rc4(int) des(int) aes(partial) idea(int) blowfish(ptr) compiler: clang -fPIC -arch arm64 -O3 -Wall -DL_ENDIAN -DOPENSSL_PIC -DOPENSSL_CPUID_OBJ -DOPENSSL_BN_ASM_MONT -DSHA1_ASM -DSHA256_ASM -DSHA512_ASM -DKECCAK1600_ASM -DVPAES_ASM -DECP_NISTZ256_ASM -DPOLY1305_ASM -D_REENTRANT -DNDEBUG The 'numbers' are in 1000s of bytes per second processed. type 16 bytes 64 bytes 256 bytes 1024 bytes 8192 bytes 16384 bytes aes-256-gcm 1001410.93k 2674462.35k 4020612.61k 4051648.47k 3813676.37k 3968878.79k ``` 重新用 OpenSSL 跑了下，好像自带的 LibreSSL 有点问题 |
 |
3
linusyang 2022-04-19 16:32:13 +08:00 via iPhone
LibreSSL 没有 arm64 的汇编优化，只有 x86_64 的。OpenSSL 的指令集优化多一点。
|
|
4
xtinput 2022-04-19 16:48:55 +08:00
version: 3.0.2
built on: Tue Mar 15 14:30:24 2022 UTC options: bn(64,64) compiler: clang -fPIC -arch arm64 -O3 -Wall -DL_ENDIAN -DOPENSSL_PIC -D_REENTRANT -DOPENSSL_BUILDING_OPENSSL -DNDEBUG CPUINFO: OPENSSL_armcap=0x7f The 'numbers' are in 1000s of bytes per second processed. type 16 bytes 64 bytes 256 bytes 1024 bytes 8192 bytes 16384 bytes AES-256-GCM 933194.39k 2587635.29k 4097587.80k 4664237.94k 5703328.13k 5812055.75k |
|
5
linusyang 2022-04-19 16:58:46 +08:00 via iPhone
另外可以用自带的试试 aes-128-gcm ，貌似有优化。
|
 |
6
MrKrabs 2022-04-19 16:59:35 +08:00  1
|
|
7
keyfunc OP @linusyang 是的，好像 128 很快，原生比 rosetta 快了，差距并不大
LibreSSL rosetta aes-128-gcm 1531638.85k 5946102.75k 23789147.19k 95029256.18k 760820812.43k LibreSSL 原生 aes-128-gcm 2220132.69k 8950815.61k 35738367.40k 143223969.26k 1145713507.08k OpenSSL aes-128-gcm 1129241.01k 3110185.88k 4705038.08k 4669664.39k 4536124.82k |
Select Language