千万不要去人少地少的地方 还全世界很多第三世界国家的人被忽悠往那里跑
人少各种生活资料更少全靠进口 造的房子也少
所有东西 可选择的更少

@silence0812
不是说小三阳没症状就不要管吗

@wtsamuel
土生土长的澳洲人都在骂交警整天路上抓罚款
没长期在国外待过的人 却羡慕国外

@silence0812
病毒数量多少
小三阳不是不要管吗

@silence0812
乙肝应该少吃药 你什么症状和生化指标要吃药？

@unixipc
具体什么事情不开心？

人类现在连耳鸣 失眠都治不好 还脑机接口呢

@nethard
脑电信号翻译之类就不是 ai 了
现在的技术 现在的脑科学 还无法用机器翻译或取代大脑
人的大脑都没有完全研究透 这是脑神经科学领域 现在的计算机太 low 了

@nethard
跟 emacs 无关 作者是伦敦大学讲师

tax non residdnt alien 简称 NRA

@germain
american rescue plan 要求税 现在税表还没发下来

老家农村最好 可惜跟老父母有代沟不想跟他们住一块 又因为一宅一户 不能新申请地基 不然自己造个新房子 跟别墅一样 也不用搭理来串门的农村人
那样就生活在农村 心态完全可以不再农村

那段博文原作者叫 Dan McQuillan

原文：
https://www.danmcquillan.org/chatgpt.html

完全没被这波 ai 冲昏头脑
复制一段 xemacs 作者博客的 一段博文：


ChatGPT is, in technical terms, a 'bullshit generator'. If a generated sentence makes sense to you, the reader, it means the mathematical model has made sufficiently good guess to pass your sense-making filter. The language model has no idea what it's talking about because it has no idea about anything at all. It's more of a bullshitter than the most egregious egoist you'll ever meet, producing baseless assertions with unfailing confidence because that's what it's designed to do. [...]

Of course, the makers of GPT learned by experience that an untended LLM will tend to spew Islamophobia or other hatespeech in addition to talking nonsense. The technical addition in ChatGPT is known as Reinforcement Learning from Human Feedback (RHLF). While the whole point of an LLM is that the training data set is too huge for human labelling, a small subset of curated data is used to build a monitoring system which attempts to constrain output against criteria for relevance and non-toxicity. It can't change the fact that the underlying language patterns were learned from the raw internet, including all the ravings and conspiracy theories. While RLHF makes for a better brand of bullshit, it doesn't take too much ingenuity in user prompting to reveal the bile that can lie beneath. The more plausible ChatGPT becomes, the more it recapitulates the pseudo-authoritative rationalisations of race science. [...]

ChatGPT is a part of a reality distortion field that obscures the underlying extractivism and diverts us into asking the wrong questions and worrying about the wrong things. Instead of expressing wonder, we should be asking whether it's justifiable to burn energy at "eye watering" rates to power the world's largest bullshit machine. [...]

Commentary that claims 'ChatGPT is here to stay and we just need to learn to live with it' are embracing the hopelessness of what I call 'AI Realism'. The compulsion to show 'balance' by always referring to AI's alleged potential for good should be dropped by acknowledging that the social benefits are still speculative while the harms have been empirically demonstrated. Saying, as the OpenAI CEO does, that we are all 'stochastic parrots' like large language models, statistical generators of learned patterns that express nothing deeper, is a form of nihilism. Of course, the elites don't apply that to themselves, just to the rest of us. The structural injustices and supremacist perspectives layered into AI put it firmly on the path of eugenicist solutions to social problems.

@wtsamuel
润了后发现国外的税和法和罚款更凶

你们想一下

breaking bad 老白最后躲山里 跟唯一一个人购买时间 10 万一小时

你们真 xx 去老家农村待待看吧 能不能连续待三个月 不返城 连镇上都不去

@MelodyZhao
以前是空少 还是飞行员？

咖啡因是毒品 咖啡里含量不算高 你每天喝几瓶红牛 连续喝一段日子 你会发现你会傻笑 不漂亮的女人也会认为漂亮 心脏会出问题

长期喝咖啡 想想看